It was the light, such brightness. We’d had heat for days, temperatures hitting forty degrees Celsius, the chooks barely coping, before a stretch of cool, overcast weather, a little mist. But on Tuesday just gone, there it was, the light, such brightness, extraordinary clarity, as if we’d been living through a dust-storm that had suddenly cleared, or I’d finally cleaned the windows after twenty years of domestic laziness (which reminds me). In reality, it was nothing more than a morning with a clear blue sky, no heat, just the clear blue sky, but how magical it felt. I wanted to grab my coffee and sit outside and be out there, amongst the light on the blooming white roses, on the lavender that’s coming, and on the tomatoes that are fruiting up nicely; and the chooks, of course, those angels of the handkerchief-sized yard of mine.
But still I went down there, the opposite direction, to my writing room at the front of the house and opposite the library. It’s quite a big room, my writing room – it could easily fit in a queen-sized bed (which would result in no writing, that’s for sure). There’s a view out into the front veranda and the strip of yard out the front and the picture-postcard picket fence and the plane-tree avenue and the houses on the other side of the road and Rocky Hill on the other side of town. But I’m getting carried away. The point is I like my writing room: there’s no internet, no stereo, no bookshelves except a small white one that contains a collection of dictionaries. One black Acer PC, which is holding up well considering how cheap it was; a Canon colour printer-scanner-copier, of which I’m just a little too fond. The walls are painted a deep mud-red, which, in certain kinds of light, matches the turpentine floorboards. A lot of things on the walls: a painting done by a friend, screen-prints, photos I’ve taken (some dating back to the early 1980s), story outlines.
So I enjoy it, being in this place, but on a day when the light outside is so extraordinary that you find that you’ve spent ten minutes staring at it, marvelling, there are thoughts that go through my head: why do I go down the hallway to the writing room? What’s the true impulse? Perhaps the most honest – and potentially most famous – essay on the subject is ‘Why I Write’ by George Orwell (1953). Orwell talks about ego, and aesthetic enthusiasm, and political purpose, amongst others, with political purpose being his greatest motivator: ‘…looking back through my work, I see that it is invariably where I lacked a political purpose that I wrote lifeless books and was betrayed into purple passages, sentences without meaning, decorative adjectives and humbug generally’.
I can’t find any reason to disagree with Orwell, but somehow there’s something missing. Although it’s rather presumptuous – pompous even – to talk about my own motivations (Fall On Me might be pretty good, but it’s no Animal Farm), the topic is something I often think about, especially when I’ve just received bad news – the rejection of a story submitted, notice of a bad review, or my own conclusion that what I’m writing is stillborn. Why exactly do I insist on spending the majority of my week sitting at my desk and making up stories? In many ways, it’s an absurd practice: I did it as a kid, it was just playing back then, and I’m still doing it now, aged forty-three, except it remains playing. Even though I write contemporary realist fiction, I’m doing nothing more than making up worlds and characters and predicaments.
Sure there are things I want to say, there are records that I want to leave behind, and, yes, I do love playing with words and sentences; getting life on the page is no easy task, in fact it’s more impossible than possible, so there’s an almighty challenge in all of this, and when it happens, that life, when you can feel pulse on the page, when the world is as real as any world can ever be, well, there’s no other feeling of accomplishment – it’s as though you’ve managed to go to the moon and back. But I can’t escape thinking that the main reason why I turn away from spending a day outside in the most magical of light is that, on the whole, I find the fictional world more interesting than the world on the other side of the glass.
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 22, 2012 at 9:16+00:00Jan
broadsideblog
I don’t write fiction but I’m starting to think it’s a vital sign…writing…like pulse and respiration.
January 24, 2012 at 9:16+00:00Jan
Nigel Featherstone
Yes, I agree that it’s a vital sign. Of course, there are days when the sign isn’t as vital as it needs to be (!), but, in general, life is bereft of much of its meaning without practicing this bloody art.
January 22, 2012 at 9:16+00:00Jan
Gabrielle Bryden
I would like to ride a donkey to the shops – haha. Lovely writing Nigel – you could have gone outside just that once – when the light was right. But I know what you mean – I often think I should be going for a walk along the beach on a beautiful day, but there I am tapping away at my computer. ps can’t believe you don’t like Shakespeare
January 24, 2012 at 9:16+00:00Jan
Nigel Featherstone
Hi Gabe, I’m probably presenting myself as being more of a machine than I really am – I do seem to spend an inordinate amount of time watching the chooks and watering the garden. But I always find my way back down the hall. I’ll work out the real reason one day.
On the Shakespeare front – I’d love to say that I love him, but I just don’t https://nigelfeatherstone.wordpress.com/2010/05/23/shakespeare-bloody-well-not-in-love/
January 29, 2012 at 9:16+00:00Jan
Tristan
I hide far too regularly in books and bookshops. I probably spend my spare time fiddling with words, trying to construct worlds, for the same reason – to hide. I wonder about it too sometimes, but I spend enough time in the real world to know why I do it.
Maybe you feel there’s a few gaps in your answer to Why, but there’s plenty of evidence in the above as to why you should, as Gabrielle has pointed out.
By the way, I only just caught your Millions piece – loved it.
January 30, 2012 at 9:16+00:00Jan
Nigel Featherstone
Thanks Tristan.
Perhaps it’s also about the pleasure of problem-solving, which after all, is the core task of creativity – maybe. And it’s also about working out what we think. Being a slow thinker, I’m best at coming to rational solutions with a pen in my hand. In person, it’s just a bit scattered, I’m afraid.
And I’m glad you enjoyed The Millions piece. I was thrilled that they published the thing.